Search
Close this search box.

Search Results for: Irina Tsukerman

BDS supporters have shifted to a new strategy, a โ€œde-localizingโ€ of the Palestinian cause via attacks on Israelโ€™s cybersecurity industry. Their aim is to universalize an image of Israel as a facilitator of global rights abuses. This approach does not require adherents to support the Palestinian cause to gain momentum. In the face of regional geopolitical turmoil, Israel should develop an offensive disruptive response to undo the reputational damage caused by this aggressive form of information warfare.
The recent explosion at Beirut Port highlights both Turkey's growing defense cooperation with Iran and its strategic interest in Lebanon, which facilitates Ankaraโ€™s provocative and worrisome agenda in the Eastern Mediterranean. However, Turkeyโ€™s unrestrained aggression in that region may be a diversionary tactic from its slow and patient pursuit of a complex strategy to surround Egypt with hostile forces on multiple fronts and undercut its powerful regional role.
In recent years, the common refrain that US involvement in Middle Eastern conflicts is costly, counterproductive, and morally and practically indefensible has taken hold in foreign policy circles and reflects the popular mindset that brought Donald Trump to power. However, closer examination of three of the sprawling conflicts plaguing the Middle East region todayโ€”Syria, Libya, and Yemenโ€”shows that by abdicating regional responsibilities, the US has contributed to the globalization and perpetuation of โ€œendless wars.โ€
The recent revelations about Saโ€™ad Jabri, an Islamist and corrupt former Saudi intelligenceย officer, highlight the discrepancy between Western institutions' criticism of Saudi Arabia in the name of human rights and their support for the former officials most responsible for human rights abuses and security threats associated with the Kingdom. A tangled web of relations between pro-Brotherhood Muhammad bin Nayef regime apparatchiks, pro-Qatar members of US law enforcement (like Ali Soufan), and ideologically sympathetic intermediaries (like Jamal Khashoggi) are threatened by Muhammad bin Salman's reforms.
There are signs that the current escalation between Armenia and Azerbaijan, far from being incidental to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, is driven by Russiaโ€™s and Iranโ€™s economic warfare against a competing state and the need to return Europe to dependency on their oil and gas in light of US sanctions. Armenia benefits from the bellicose activity thanks to a sophisticated information warfare campaign in a heated US election year that has been unmatched thus far by Azerbaijan. But Baku can still turn its underdog position around by pursuing an assertive and affirmative policy against aggressors on military, political, media, and legal fronts.
The Israel-UAE peace deal was an unpleasant surprise to the Moroccan diplomatic and intelligence community as it foiled the general expectation that Rabat would be the third regional power to hold the distinction of normalizing relations with Jerusalem. Reliance on past accomplishments in relationship-building, sentimental historical ties, and informal alliances with lobby groups are no longer sufficientย if Morocco still wishes to play a leading role in this geopolitical chess game. Rabat can still come out ahead if it adopts an assertive strategic policy reorientation, even if it has lost the advantage of being the first to make a move.
For the Muslim Brotherhood, the Libyan conflict is an opportunity to flex its muscles in the โ€œweak linkโ€ of the Arab Muslim world. Weak African countries have once again become recruiting grounds for Qatar-funded and Turkey-backed Islamist ideologues. For all the criticism of the shortcomings of the governing structure in Sudan, the political alternatives that are emerging thanks to the Brotherhoodโ€™s allianceย with leftists and Communists may be far worse.
A recent unsubstantiated Amnesty International report attacking Morocco for its alleged use of Israeli software to surveil a journalist is part of Amnestyโ€™s pattern of defending turncoat intelligence officers, rogue political operatives, and foreign agents against their governments. While Amnesty failed in its bid to have the Israeli government revoke NSOโ€™s license to export this software, it continues to add to the chorus of media and human rights organizations that amplify claims made by anti-Israel, pro-Islamist activists of surveillance, character assassination, and technology manipulation. These charges may be evidence of the depth and breadth of Qatari information warfare.

Accessibility Toolbar