The hesitancy by the Biden administration to withhold advanced weaponry damaged the Ukrainian counteroffensive and may have led to Russiaโs current upper hand in the conflict. As Russia has now adapted to the war, it will be much harder to change the momentum back.
American foreign policy
Shortly after the US presidential election in November, experts met the BESA Center to analyze the reasons for, and international implications of, Donald Trumpโs triumph, and to dissect the โYom Kippurโ of the liberal elite and media.
- Prof. Eytan Gilboa
- December 1, 2016
- Paper No. 382
President-Elect Trump has serious decisions to make about the Middle East, including what to do about Syria, how to tackle Islamic State, how to take on Iran, and, of course, how to handle the perennial Israel-Palestinian problem. Trumpโs margin of error is narrow, especially since Russia and Iran are likely to test his leadership and determination.
- Dr. Tsilla Hershco
- November 29, 2016
- Paper No. 381
US President-Elect Donald Trump has toned down the anti-NATO rhetoric he employed on the campaign trail, but it remains uncertain whether he appreciates the value of the organization for American interests. NATO provides security insurance not only to Europe but also to the US. Trump should be cautious about weakening its deterrence and power projection.
- Col. (res.) Dr. Eran Lerman
- July 14, 2016
- Paper No. 350
A year after it was finalized, the nuclear deal with Iran has clearly made the region and the world more dangerous, notwithstanding the temporary respite won in Iran's pursuit of a nuclear weapon. The Obama administration's advocacy of warmer relations with Tehran appears totally removed from realities on the ground. Iran is using its new legal position to obscure, rather than clarify, past activities and present inventories; work on ballistic missiles and on the acquisition of materials for Iran's non-conventional weapons arsenal continues apace; repression has worsened; regional subversion is at its peak; and exterminatory positions towards Israel are openly put forward. The JCPoA has in no way moderated Iran's stance, nor made it a legitimate member of the community of nations.
While congressional support for Israel has historically transcended the partisan divide, Republicans and Democrats are growing less cooperative with regard to the means by which to express that support. The authors term this development as โcongressional dysergia.โ Tensions between the executive branch and Congress are growing as well, as exhibited in conflicts between the Republican-dominated Congress and President Obama.
Contrary to the assertion that Barack Obamaโs foreign policy lacks direction or ideological basis, Prof. David argues the presidentโs foreign policy can be explained as adhering very closely to traditional realist theory.