Search
Close this search box.

Search Results for: Belarus – Page 5

Alexander Lukashenkoโ€™s days as the autocratic president of Belarus are clearly numbered, and Russia will likely play a key role in his exit. What is less clear is just how that exit will come about and what role the neighbor to the East will play. Recent history provides us with a few possible scenarios.
The recent โ€œbackpacker deal,โ€ theย Crimean Peninsula annexation, and Russiaโ€™s Sochi Olympic Games are all examples of Vladimir Putin's global โ€œsmart powerโ€ strategy, which combines soft and hard power. In winning Russian sovereignty over the Jerusalem complex containing the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, he scored a significant soft power win.
From a foreign policy standpoint, Russia should be fairly secure this year. In the Middle East, its main competitors will remain divided; while on a global scale, the self-absorption of the US and the EU should give Moscow some breathing room. Internally, however, Russia will face major challenges. As its economy continues to lag, domestic protests should increase across the country, as will the need to improve quality of life.
Russian foreign policy since the mid-2000s tends to be perceived in contradictory terms: as either a negative for Russia or the product of a grand strategic vision on the part of the Russian leadership. It is also often falsely perceived as representing a break with the past. Moscowโ€™s foreign policy moves need to be viewed with a balanced perspective and should be placed in their historical context.
Ukraine has a new president, 41-year-old Volodymyr Zelensky. While some argue that Kievโ€™s policy toward Russia is now likely to undergo a significant positive change, geopolitical realities suggest the opposite. Ukraine-Russia relations might in fact worsen now that Moscow has eased the citizenship process for Donbas residents.
Competition among Middle Eastern rivals and ultimate power within the regionโ€™s various alliances is increasingly as much economic and commercial as it is military and geopolitical. Battles are fought as much on geopolitical fronts as they are on economic and cultural battlefields such as soccer.
On March 18, Russia elected Vladimir Putin for a fourth presidential term, making his rule the longest since Joseph Stalinโ€™s. But this next term will be a new experience for both Putin and the Russian people. In terms of foreign policy, Moscow face increased Western challenges. Internally, Putin will have to decide whether to prolong his rule in 2024 or pick a successor โ€“ a process with significant foreign policy reverberations that will involve reshuffles and elite infighting inside the Kremlin.
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, President of Turkey Recep Erdogan and the President of Poland, Andrzej Duda, in Warsaw on July 8, 2016. (Image source: NATO/Flickr)
ErdoฤŸan prepares to launch his campaign for presidential elections scheduled for November 2019. At a time of rising xenophobia and anti-western sentiments across Turkey, his campaign will undoubtedly target the โ€œevil powers of the West,โ€ adding to the isolationist Turkish psyche. Russian President Vladimir Putin could not have possibly found a better partner for his attempts to divide and weaken NATO.
When the Eurasian Economic Union (aka the Eurasian Union) was unveiled in early 2015, it had one major goal: to strengthen Moscowโ€™s position across the former Soviet space. By promising economic benefits and military protection, the Kremlin managed to bring Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Kyrgyzstan into the Union and solidify its influence over them. However, the Eurasian Union has stalled since then. It lags considerably far behind other major unions across the Eurasian continent in terms of overall economic and political influence, and will continue to face major geopolitical competition from the European Union (EU).

Accessibility Toolbar