Iran

Armenian MFA statement
Israeli strikes on Iran and Iranโ€™s ballistic missile attacks on Israel have made it clear where the two main rivals in the South Caucasus โ€” Azerbaijan and Armenia โ€” stand. Monitoring of media and social networks in both countries shows that Baku immediately adopted a neutral position, merely expressing concern over the consequences of military actions. In contrast, Armenian state-affiliated outlets, parties, and diaspora organizations worldwide took a clearly pro-Iranian stance.
In the ongoing geopolitical conflict between Iran and Israel, Iranโ€™s relations with post-Soviet statesโ€”especially those with which it shares a direct borderโ€”play a crucial role. The tensions between Iran and Azerbaijan are well-known to experts, same goes for Iranโ€™s close ties with Armenia. However, a less frequently discussed yet highly significant aspect is the nature of Iranโ€™s relationship with the third post-Soviet state with which it shares a borderโ€”Turkmenistan.
Hezbollah's leadership cannot ignore growing voices supporting a new strategy for the movement that emphasizes its Lebanese identity. If adopted, this approach could mean a reduction of the organization's traditional dependence on Iran and a more practical and substantive integration into domestic Lebanese politics. Right now, the likelihood that Hezbollah will take the initiative to renew fighting with Israel seems slim.
IDF Spokesperson
Many commentators claim that Israel lacks a clear plan for โ€œthe day afterโ€ the end of the Iron Swords War. They argue that because of this supposed lack, Israel will not be able to hold onto its military achievements during the war, which will remain merely tactical. But Israel is not playing a short-term game. Beyond its declared war goals, Israel is aiming to create a new security reality in the region by weakening Iran and its proxies. This broader goal stems from the understanding that to Israel, this war is existential, and the removal of significant threats from Israelโ€™s borders is non-negotiable. Israel understands that it cannot impose plans or political proposals on its opponents, be they Palestinian or Lebanese โ€“ but by demonstrating its clear military superiority over them, Israel will improve its position in future negotiations. Finally, there is potential for new regional arrangements, including normalization with more Arab countries, if Israel succeeds in significantly weakening the Iranian threat. If Israel can show potential allies major military achievements against a common enemy, it can suggest a political plan that will improve its position in the region โ€“ but not before then. For Israel there is no end game, only a long game.
The war in Ukraine has substantially weakened Russia's position in Central Asia and the Southern Caucasus, requiring an increasing amount of resources to sustain. Iran is endeavoring to fill the power vacuum that Russia left in these post-Soviet regions while simultaneously exercising caution to prevent conflict. Tehran is committed to the economic integration of the post-Soviet republics in these regions, with an emphasis on fortifying its relationships with the Eurasian Economic Union.

Accessibility Toolbar